NCRC applauds Court-Ordered Implementation for Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act

Today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed a settlement agreement with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California that outlines court-ordered deadlines for implementation of Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Section 1071 requires financial institutions to compile, maintain and submit to the CFPB certain data on credit applications by women- and minority-owned small businesses. 

The CFPB’s agreement was in response to a lawsuit filed by Democracy Forward and Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP on behalf of NCRC member organization California Reinvestment Coalition, the National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders (NALCAB) and small business owners in Waterloo, Iowa, and Portland, Oregon.

Jesse Van Tol, CEO of NCRC, made the following statement:

“The implementation of Section 1071 is long overdue. NCRC’s research and evaluation of small business lending has shown time and again that discrimination is still part of the experience for many women- and minority-owned businesses. Despite these findings, it has also been clear to us that much of this discrimination goes unnoticed by banks and their federal regulators, and there is inadequate data collection for the public to hold them to account. The need for this data was recognized in 2010 when Dodd-Frank was enacted, and it is a case study in bureaucratic disfunction and obstruction that it has taken this long to implement Section 1071 – and finally, after all these years, only with a court order. This data, once it’s finally available to the public, will provide valuable insight for understanding this opaque market and enable regulators and stakeholders to hold banks accountable for their small business lending practices.”

I also want to commend the efforts of the plaintiffs in pursuing this case and winning this agreement with CFPB.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Redlining and Neighborhood Health

Before the pandemic devastated minority communities, banks and government officials starved them of capital.

Lower-income and minority neighborhoods that were intentionally cut off from lending and investment decades ago today suffer not only from reduced wealth and greater poverty, but from lower life expectancy and higher prevalence of chronic diseases that are risk factors for poor outcomes from COVID-19, a new study shows.

The new study, from the National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC) with researchers from the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health and the University of Richmond’s Digital Scholarship Lab, compared 1930’s maps of government-sanctioned lending discrimination zones with current census and public health data.

Table of Content

  • Executive Summary
  • Introduction
  • Redlining, the HOLC Maps and Segregation
  • Segregation, Public Health and COVID-19
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion and Policy Recommendations
  • Citations
  • Appendix

Complete the form to download the full report: