Anti-Predatory Lending and Sustainable Homeownership

Since the last review of the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA) by the Federal Reserve Board, the home mortgage market has changed considerably. Subprime lending has become a dominant force, unregulated mortgage brokers now originate a large part of the mortgages, and exotic mortgages with exploding interest rates have become a common occurrence.

Motivated by financial incentives, predatory lenders confront consumers with unaffordable mortgages and charge fees and interest rates well beyond the level necessary to cover risk. Borrowers are steered into unsuitable products and not presented with the better options for which they qualify. Inflated appraisals remove equity from borrowers’ homes, and loan servicers charge unnecessary fees which can push borrowers towards foreclosure.

NCRC leads the movement for a strong national anti-predatory lending law, which will provide the best protection for all consumers and promote homeownership sustainability. The following guide us in that effort:

  • Strong consumer protections that improve upon existing state and federal laws
  • Codification of existing industry best practices, GSE guidance, and practices outlined in the Attorney General settlements
  • Protections that hold the secondary market accountable for screening out predatory loans
  • A comprehensive national anti-predatory lending bill
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Redlining and Neighborhood Health

Before the pandemic devastated minority communities, banks and government officials starved them of capital.

Lower-income and minority neighborhoods that were intentionally cut off from lending and investment decades ago today suffer not only from reduced wealth and greater poverty, but from lower life expectancy and higher prevalence of chronic diseases that are risk factors for poor outcomes from COVID-19, a new study shows.

The new study, from the National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC) with researchers from the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health and the University of Richmond’s Digital Scholarship Lab, compared 1930’s maps of government-sanctioned lending discrimination zones with current census and public health data.

Table of Content

  • Executive Summary
  • Introduction
  • Redlining, the HOLC Maps and Segregation
  • Segregation, Public Health and COVID-19
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion and Policy Recommendations
  • Citations
  • Appendix

Complete the form to download the full report: